Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Modified surgical techniques for total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: One institution's experience.

ShanYong Z., Liu H., Yang C., Zhang X., Abdelrehem A., Zheng J.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 15 on Scar, published in J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
J Craniomaxillofac Surg (2015)
Country
Scotland
Reported sample size
15
Source database
PubMed
PMID
26003591
DOI
10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.028

Abstract (original English)

To present three modified techniques of total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJ TJR) and to evaluate the outcomes regarding prosthesis stability and heterotopic bone formation. A total of 15 patients (19 joints), treated with the Biomet stock prosthesis from May 2006 to May 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical procedures were performed with the following three modifications: bone grafting of the glenoid fossa; salvage of TMJ discs; and harvesting of retro-mandibular subcutaneous fats. The glenoid fossa depth was measured preoperatively by Surgicase 5.0 software. All patients were evaluated by radiographic examination and surgical observation. The fossa was grafted with an autogenous bone in 15 joints (78.9%). In 4 joints (21.1%), only bone repair was performed. Radiographic evaluation revealed a good integration between the autogenous and host bones. All patients showed postoperative occlusal stability. In 5 joints (26.3%), the discs were salvaged. Both bleeding and operation time were reduced. Fat grafts were harvested in 17 joints (89.5%), in which there were no abnormalities in the periprosthetic bone structure. In 2 joints (10.5%), with no fat grafting, heterotopic bone formation was found. The modified techniques of TJR help to improve prostheses stability, reducing heterotopic bone formation and avoiding additional scars.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AgedArthroplasty, ReplacementAutograftsBlood Loss, SurgicalBone TransplantationCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJoint Prosthesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research