Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Modulating Schwann cell behavior via functional nerve guidance conduits for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration

Yang K., Yang S., Teng X., He X., Sun T., Chen H.

Narrative Review, published in NPJ Regen Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
NPJ Regen Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41298588
PMCID
PMC12657993
DOI
10.1038/s41536-025-00443-w
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

Peripheral nerve injuries beyond 5 cm lack effective treatments. Functional nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have emerged as transformative tools orchestrating regeneration by leveraging Schwann cell (SC)-centric mechanisms. This review comprehensively analyzes how NGC designs modulate SC behavior through three synergistic axes: physical cues, biochemical signaling, and bioelectric regulation. By enhancing microenvironmental regulation, next-generation NGCs aim to surpass autograft efficacy, offering scalable solutions for functional nerve recovery and improved patient outcomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.