Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutics for SBMA/Kennedy's Disease

Arnold FJ., Merry DE.

Clinical Trial on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurotherapeutics (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Neurotherapeutics (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31686397
PMCID
PMC6985201
DOI
10.1007/s13311-019-00790-9
Citations
44

Abstract (original English)

Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by a polyglutamine (polyQ) expansion in the androgen receptor (AR). Despite the fact that the monogenic cause of SBMA has been known for nearly 3 decades, there is no effective treatment for this disease, underscoring the complexity of the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to a loss of motor neurons and muscle in SBMA patients. In the current review, we provide an overview of the system-wide clinical features of SBMA, summarize the structure and function of the AR, discuss both gain-of-function and loss-of-function mechanisms of toxicity caused by polyQ-expanded AR, and describe the cell and animal models utilized in the study of SBMA. Additionally, we summarize previously conducted clinical trials which, despite being based on positive results from preclinical studies, proved to be largely ineffective in the treatment of SBMA; nonetheless, these studies provide important insights as researchers develop the next generation of therapies.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansPeptidesReceptors, AndrogenTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionClinical Trials as TopicBulbo-Spinal Atrophy, X-Linked

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research