Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Morphofunctional characterization of decellularized vena cava as tissue engineering scaffolds.

Bertanha M., Moroz A., Jaldin RG., Silva RA., Rinaldi JC., Golim MA.

Animal Study on Peripheral Artery Disease, published in Exp Cell Res (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Exp Cell Res (2014)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24929113
DOI
10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.05.023

Abstract (original English)

Clinical experience for peripheral arterial disease treatment shows poor results when synthetic grafts are used to approach infrapopliteal arterial segments. However, tissue engineering may be an option to yield surrogate biocompatible neovessels. Thus, biological decellularized scaffolds could provide natural tissue architecture to use in tissue engineering, when the absence of ideal autologous veins reduces surgical options. The goal of this study was to evaluate different chemical induced decellularization protocols of the inferior vena cava of rabbits. They were decellularized with Triton X100 (TX100), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or sodium deoxycholate (DS). Afterwards, we assessed the remaining extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity, residual toxicity and the biomechanical resistance of the scaffolds. Our results showed that TX100 was not effective to remove the cells, while protocols using SDS 1% for 2h and DS 2% for 1h, efficiently removed the cells and were better characterized. These scaffolds preserved the original organization of ECM. In addition, the residual toxicity assessment did not reveal statistically significant changes while decellularized scaffolds retained the equivalent biomechanical properties when compared with the control. Our results concluded that protocols using SDS and DS were effective at obtaining decellularized scaffolds, which may be useful for

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedExtracellular MatrixFemaleImmunoenzyme TechniquesMesenchymal Stem CellsRabbits

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research