Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Multilineage differentiation of dental pulp stem cells from green fluorescent protein transgenic mice.

Grottkau BE., Purudappa PP., Lin YF.

Animal Study, published in Int J Oral Sci (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Oral Sci (2010)
Country
India
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
20690415
DOI
10.4248/IJOS10015

Abstract (original English)

The aim of this study was to confirm the multilineage differentiation ability of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) from green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice. The expression of GFP in DPSCs was also observed during differentiation. DPSCs were harvested from the dental pulp tissue of transgenic nude mice, and then transferred to osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic media. The morphological characterization of induced cells was observed by microscopy and histological staining. The expression of marker genes was measured by RT-PCR. The endogenous GFP and multilineage potential of transgenic DPSCs had no influence on each other. Moreover, the results of fluorescence microscopic imaging suggest that there was no significant decline of GFP expression during DPSCs differentiation. As the population of GFP labeled DPSCs can be easily identified, this will be a promising method for tracking DPSCs in vivo.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipogenesisAnimalsAnthraquinonesAzo CompoundsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineageChondrocytesChondrogenesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.