Multitissue single-cell analysis reveals differential cellular and molecular sensitivity between fructose and high-fat high-sucrose diets.
Chen YW., Ahn IS., Wang SS., Majid S., Diamante G., Cely I.
Animal Study, published in Cell Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Cell Rep (2025)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 40349341
- PMCID
- PMC12182283
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115690
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a conglomerate of dysregulated metabolic traits that vary between individuals, is partially driven by modern diets high in fat, sucrose, or fructose and their interactions with host genes in metabolic tissues. To elucidate the roles of individual tissues and cell types in diet-induced MetS, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on the hypothalamus, liver, adipose tissue, and small intestine of mice fed high-fat high-sucrose (HFHS) or fructose diets. We found that hypothalamic neurons were sensitive to fructose, while adipose progenitor cells and macrophages were responsive to HFHS. Ligand-receptor analysis revealed lipid metabolism and inflammation networks among peripheral tissues driven by HFHS, while both diets stimulated synaptic remodeling within the hypothalamus. mt-Rnr2, a top responder to both diets, mitigated diet-induced MetS by stimulating thermogenesis. Our study demonstrates that HFHS and fructose diets have differential cell type and network targets but also share regulators such as mt-Rnr2 to affect MetS risk.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.