Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Nanofibrous-Composite Hydrogels for Modulating Stem Cell Behavior

Roca-Arroyo AF., Gutierrez-Rivera JA., Mejia-Rosales LM., Morton LD., Castilla-Casadiego DA.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Cells Tissues Organs (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cells Tissues Organs (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41989976
PMCID
PMC13188845
DOI
10.1159/000552028

Abstract (original English)

Background Hydrogels are widely used as extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimetic biomaterials, but most lack the nanofibrous hierarchy of the native extracellular matrix, which is essential for regulating human stem cells (hSCs) behavior. Nanofibrous-composite hydrogels address this limitation by incorporating fibrillar cues, either intrinsically formed, dispersed within the matrix, or applied at the surface, to better replicate the structural and mechanotopographical features of the stem cell niche. Summary This review systematically compares three nanofiber-hydrogel architectures: self-assembling nanofiber matrices, hydrogels with encapsulated electrospun fibers, and hydrogels surface-decorated with fibrous coatings. We examine how differences in fiber chemistry, stiffness, degradability, and spatial organization regulate key hSCs' behaviors, including adhesion, viability, morphology, proliferation, migration, differentiation, and secretion. Polymeric, natural, hybrid, magnetic, and bioactive nanoparticle reinforced fibers are each discussed to highlight how each configuration generates distinct biophysical and biochemical cues. By linking fabrication strategies to resulting cellular outcomes, this review outlines architecture-specific advantages and limitations that inform the rational design of next-generation ECM-mimetic scaffolds. Key messages Nanofibrous hydrogels bridge the g

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research