A narrative review of basic and clinical studies for vocal fold regeneration therapies.
Miura C., Ueha R., Dealino MA., Matsumoto N., Sato T., Goto T.
Narrative Review, published in Auris Nasus Larynx (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Auris Nasus Larynx (2024)
- Country
- Netherlands
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 39476786
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.anl.2024.10.011
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Objective To review the various basic research and treatments available to regenerate the vocal folds and to discuss the direction for future treatments. Methods A comprehensive review was performed in PubMed database and Google Scholar utilizing search terms including combinations and variations of the following concepts: vocal fold anatomy, vocal fold disorders, and regenerative therapies. No particular inclusion or exclusion criteria were set due to the nature of this narrative review article. Results/discussion The regenerative treatments available for each vocal fold layer are the following: 1) epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 for the epithelial layer, 2) autologous fibroblasts, autologous bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), autologous adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction (ADSVF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), collagen-hyaluronic acid nanofiber, pirfenidone, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), pulsed dye laser (PDL), diode laser, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the lamina propria, 3) bFGF and controlled-release bFGF with autologous fascia, HGF, c-Met agonistic antibody, and PRP for the muscular layer, 4) and bFGF and PRP-loaded nerve guidance conduit for the nerve. Treatments deemed clinically safe with sustained efficacy assessed up to 6 months are HGF and PDL, while bFGF, autologous fibroblasts, autologous bone
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.