Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Negative Printing for the Reinforcement of In Situ Tissue-Engineered Cartilage.

Doyle SE., Snow F., Onofrillo C., Di Bella C., O'Connell CD., Pirogova E.

Laboratory Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Tissue Eng Part A (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Tissue Eng Part A (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38517083
DOI
10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0358
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

In the realm of in situ cartilage engineering, the targeted delivery of both cells and hydrogel materials to the site of a defect serves to directly stimulate chondral repair. Although the in situ application of stem cell-laden soft hydrogels to tissue defects holds great promise for cartilage regeneration, a significant challenge lies in overcoming the inherent limitation of these soft hydrogels, which must attain mechanical properties akin to the native tissue to withstand physiological loading. We therefore developed a system where a gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel laden with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells is combined with a secondary structure to provide bulk mechanical reinforcement. In this study, we used the negative embodied sacrificial template 3D printing technique to generate eight different lattice-based reinforcement structures made of polycaprolactone, which ranged in porosity from 80% to 90% with stiffnesses from 28 ± 5 kPa to 2853 ± 236 kPa. The most promising of these designs, the hex prism edge, was combined with the cellular hydrogel and retained a stable stiffness over 41 days of chondrogenic differentiation. There was no significant difference between the hydrogel-only and hydrogel scaffold group in the sulfated glycosaminoglycan production (340.46 ± 13.32 µg and 338.92 ± 47.33 µg, respectively) or Type II Collagen gene expression. As such, the

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Tissue EngineeringHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalMesenchymal Stem CellsTissue ScaffoldsHydrogelsCartilageChondrogenesisPolyestersCell Differentiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research