Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

A New Classification for Adipose-derived Stromal-cell Systems.

Copcu HE.

Laboratory Study on Scar, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36583163
PMCID
PMC9750561
DOI
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004712
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Obtaining regenerative cells from adipose tissue and their clinical use has become one of the most popular subjects of plastic surgery. However, there is no accepted classification in terms of methods. In this study, classification is proposed for the first time as a new idea. Accordingly, stromal cells can be obtained from adipose tissue by two approaches: direct methods for the bonds between parenchymal and stromal cells, and indirect methods, which target parenchymal cells rather than strong bonds, and increase the stromal cell ratio relatively. These methods can also be subclassified as fat (+), fat (-), fat (±) in terms of using the remaining fat in the final product as a graft. Direct methods include adinizing and enzymatic techniques; indirect methods include emulsification and micro-fragmentation/micronization techniques. In the enzymatic method, the fat tissue in the final product is considered dirty because it contains enzymes and must be discarded. That is why it is a fat (-) method. The adinizing method using ultra-sharp blades is fat (+) because the adipose tissue after the procedure can be used. Because the fat tissue is exposed to blunt pressure in emulsification techniques, it cannot be used as a graft. Thus, these are fat (-) methods. In micronization techniques using filter systems, there may still be intact adipocytes; therefore, it should be classified as fa

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research