Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A new nanocomposite scaffold based on polyurethane and clay nanoplates for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

Norouz F., Halabian R., Salimi A., Ghollasi M.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2019)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31349533
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2019.109857
Citations
18

Abstract (original English)

Bone tissue engineering as an alternative strategy, provides a great opportunity for regeneration of large bone tissue lesions. The use of biodegradable porous scaffolds along with stem cells, cytokines and growth factors improves cell survival, adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. In the present study, clay nanoplates (CNPs) were surface-modified (MCNPs) using phosphoric acid and calcium hydroxide, then porous polyurethane (PU) scaffolds and PU-MCNPs nanocomposite scaffolds were synthesized using solvent evaporation-dissolution technique. Physicochemical and morphological properties of scaffolds and MCNPs were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, thermal behavior of scaffolds was assessed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Degradability, water uptake and mechanical behaviors of scaffolds were evaluated and hydrophilicity properties of them were obtained by contact angle technique. MTT assay and Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide (AO/EB) staining were used to assess the biocompatibility of MCNPs and PU scaffolds regarding cell attachment and proliferation support. Osteogenic differentiation of cultured human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADSCs) on MCNPs, PU and PU-MCNPs scaffolds was evaluated using common osteogenic markers such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
ClayHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNanocompositesOsteogenesisPolyurethanesTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research