Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

New perspectives in cell delivery systems for tissue regeneration: natural-derived injectable hydrogels.

Munarin F., Petrini P., Bozzini S., Tanzi MC.

Narrative Review on Disc Degeneration, Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Appl Biomater Funct Mater (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater (2012)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
22865572
DOI
10.5301/JABFM.2012.9418

Abstract (original English)

Natural polymers, because of their biocompatibility, availability, and physico-chemical properties have been the materials of choice for the fabrication of injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. In particular, they are appealing materials for delivery systems and provide sustained and controlled release of drugs, proteins, gene, cells, and other active biomolecules immobilized.In this work, the use of hydrogels obtained from natural source polymers as cell delivery systems is discussed. These materials were investigated for the repair of cartilage, bone, adipose tissue, intervertebral disc, neural, and cardiac tissue. Papers from the last ten years were considered, with a particular focus on the advances of the last five years. A critical discussion is centered on new perspectives and challenges in the regeneration of specific tissues, with the aim of highlighting the limits of current systems and possible future advancements.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCartilageHumansHydrogelsIntervertebral DiscNeuronsRegenerationRegenerative Medicine

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research