Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

NF-κB Signaling as a Central Driver of Cancer Cachexia.

Li Y., Jiang H., Chen R., Huang H., Ding S.

Narrative Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Inflammation, published in Cancers (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cancers (Basel) (2026)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41749811
DOI
10.3390/cancers18040557

Abstract (original English)

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial metabolic syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle wasting, chronic systemic inflammation, and profound metabolic imbalance. Sustained activation of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway lies at the core of its pathogenesis, driving muscle proteolysis, impairing regenerative capacity, disrupting adipose tissue homeostasis, and promoting insulin resistance and anorexia. By transcriptionally regulating catabolic and pro-inflammatory gene programs across skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, the liver, and the central nervous system, NF-κB establishes a self-amplifying inflammatory-metabolic loop that perpetuates tissue wasting and systemic dysfunction. Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence identifies NF-κB as a viable therapeutic target in cancer cachexia. Pharmacologic inhibitors (e.g., SR12343, DHMEQ), anti-inflammatory strategies (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and IL-6 receptor-targeting antibodies), and nutritional interventions (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids) have shown efficacy in attenuating cachexia-associated inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and tissue loss. Notably, emerging multimodal approaches integrating NF-κB modulation with metabolic support, chemotherapy, and behavioral interventions demonstrate synergistic benefits. This review integrates current mechanistic insights and therapeutic ad

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research