Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Non-invasive, quantitative assessment of the morphology of γ-irradiated human mesenchymal stem cells and periosteal cells using digital holographic microscopy.

Kawase T., Okuda K., Nagata M., Tsuchimochi M., Yoshie H., Nakata K.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, Hip, published in Int J Radiat Biol (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Int J Radiat Biol (2016)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27586164
DOI
10.1080/09553002.2016.1230242

Abstract (original English)

To assure the quality of cells to be used in cell therapy, we examined the applicability of digital holographic microscopy (DHM) for non-invasive, quantitative assessment of changes in cell morphology. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue (MSC-AT) and bone marrow (MSC-BM), in addition to human alveolar periosteal cells (PC) as a reference, were γ-ray irradiated (1 and 4 Gy), and their morphological changes were quantified without fixation using holographic microscopy. After detachment and fixation with ethanol, cell number and surface antigen expression were determined using an automated cell counter kit and flow-cytometry, respectively. Among various indexes, only indexes related to cell size were significantly changed after γ-irradiation. Both BMC-AT and BMC-BM were enlarged and more sensitive to a low dose of γ-irradiation than PC. In contrast to PC, proteins related to DNA damage repair (γ-H2AX, p21 waf1 , p53 and Rb) were not substantially upregulated or sustained for a week in either MSC-AT or MSC-BM. Instead of DNA damage markers, we suggest that cell morphological parameters (e.g. cell volume) that are monitored by DHM could be a useful and more stable marker of MSC quality.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell SizeCell TrackingCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGamma RaysHolographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research