Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Not Available].

Barani C., Viard R., Aimard R., Lalloue C., Vincent PL., Comparin JP.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 32 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere (2020)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
32
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33276397
DOI
10.1055/a-1284-1825

Abstract (original English)

The use of lipostructure to treat burn sequelae is more and more common today. The regeneration capacities of mesenchymal stem cells appear promising on this sequelae skin, which is poorly vascularized, retractile and often painful. The aim of our study is to establish the analgesic properties, and the functional and aesthetic improvements gained by using lipostructure to treat burn sequelae. Forty-three patients who received lipostructure for burn sequelae according to the Coleman method between 2005 and 2017 were selected. Results regarding aesthetic, analgesic and mobility gain were recorded, with a minimum follow-up of one year postoperatively. Our patients consisted of 32 women and 11 men, with a mean age of 31.7 years (15 to 64 years). The mean follow-up during the study was 49.8 months (2 to 205 months). Patients received an average of 1.3 (1 to 3) sessions of lipostructure with an average of 153 cc (10 to 1040 cc) per session. Sequela sites were the face for 13 patients, the upper limb for 13 patients, the lower limb for 16 patients and the trunk for 4 patients. Twelve patients had lesions on multiple locations. Twenty patients benefited from this surgery for purely aesthetic or functional reasons, and 23 for painful sequelae. A significantly lower EVA was observed after surgery and a functional gain thanks to the restoration of no longer painful amplitudes. An aestheti

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsInjections, Intra-ArticularOsteoarthritisStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, Autologous

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research