Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Notch and Hedgehog Signaling Unveiled: Crosstalk, Roles, and Breakthroughs in Cancer Stem Cell Research

Iluta S., Nistor M., Buruiana S., Dima D.

Narrative Review, published in Life (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Life (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40003637
PMCID
PMC11856057
DOI
10.3390/life15020228
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

The development of therapies that target cancer stem cells (CSCs) and bulk tumors is both crucial and urgent. Several signaling pathways, like Notch and Hedgehog (Hh), have been strongly associated with CSC stemness maintenance and metastasis. However, the extensive crosstalk present between these two signaling networks complicates the development of long-term therapies that also minimize adverse effects on healthy tissues and are not overcome by therapy resistance from CSCs. The present work aims to overview the roles of Notch and Hh in cancer outburst and the intersection of the two pathways with one another, as well as with other networks, such as Wnt/β-catenin, TGF, and JAK/STAT3, and to explore the shaping of the tumor microenvironment (TME) with specific influence on CSC development and maintenance.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.