Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Novel therapies and innovation for systemic sclerosis skin ulceration

Frech TM., Frech M., Saknite I., O'Connell KA., Ghosh S., Baba J.

Narrative Review on Systemic / IV, published in Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36609122
PMCID
PMC11671032
DOI
10.1016/j.berh.2022.101813
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Skin ulceration is an important cause of morbidity in systemic sclerosis and can occur at anytime during disease progression. Incident disease cohorts are important for understanding whether skin ulceration represents active vasculopathy versus resultant damage. Biomarkers for skin ulcer pathogenesis, both serum and imaging, are under investigation to elucidate the functional consequences of the structural abnormalities. Novel therapeutics for the treatment of vasculopathy benefit from reliable biomarkers able to predict the disease evolution remains an important unmet need. Nonetheless, a diagnostic approach that captures early skin ulceration and treatments that restore vascular and immune homeostasis is critical for effective systemic sclerosis (SSc) vasculopathy management.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
SkinHumansScleroderma, SystemicSkin UlcerDisease ProgressionBiomarkers

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research