Off-label use of adipose-derived stem cells.
Simonacci F., Bertozzi N., Raposio E.
Clinical Trial, published in Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2017)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 29123656
- PMCID
- PMC5671395
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.10.023
- Citations
- 21
Abstract (original English)
Background Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have a broad range of clinical applications. The ease of cell harvest and high yield with minimal donor-site morbidity makes adipose tissue an ideal source of stem cells. Further, the multi-lineage potential of these cells present significant opportunities within the field of tissue engineering, with studies successfully demonstrating their ability to produce a range of tissue types. Materials and methods Literature review of publications on the use of ASCs, in the context of current European and US regulations. Results According to European and US regulations, many clinical trials reported in literature to date could be considered off-label. Conclusion In Europe, clinical trials involving cultured ASCs and/or the use of collagenase, which causes changes in the structural and functional properties of stem cells, and/or ASCs application in non-homologous tissue, should be considered off-label. ASCs should be non-cultured, isolated mechanically, and used only in the subcutaneous tissue.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.