Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Opposite spectrum of activity of canonical Wnt signaling in the osteogenic context of undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal cells: implications for tissue engineering.

Quarto N., Behr B., Longaker MT.

Animal Study, published in Tissue Eng Part A (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Tissue Eng Part A (2010)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
20590472
PMCID
PMC2947420
DOI
10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0133
Citations
40

Abstract (original English)

To delineate the competence window in which canonical wingless (Wnt)-signaling can either inhibit or promote osteogenic differentiation, we have analyzed cells with different status, specifically undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, such as adipose-derived stem cells and embryonic calvarial mesenchymal cells, and differentiated mesenchymal cells such as juvenile immature calvarial osteoblasts and adult calvarial osteoblasts. Our analysis indicated that undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and juvenile calvarial osteoblasts are endowed with higher levels of endogenous canonical Wnt signaling compared to fully differentiated adult calvarial osteoblasts, and that different levels of activation inversely correlated with expression levels of several Wnt antagonists. We have observed that activation of canonical Wnt signaling may elicit opposite biological activity in the context of osteogenic differentiation depending on the status of cell, the threshold levels of its activation, and Wnt ligands concentration. The results presented in this study indicate that treatment with Wnt3 and/or expression of constitutively activated β-catenin inhibits osteogenic differentiation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, whereas expression of dominant negative transcription factor 4 (Tcf4) and/or secreted frizzled related protein 1 treatment enhances their osteogenic differentiation. Wnt3a tr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceOsteogenesisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSignal Transduction

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.