Optimal Management of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical Considerations and Practical Management
Thangarajah T., Lo IK.
Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in Orthop Res Rev (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Orthop Res Rev (2022)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 35250316
- PMCID
- PMC8893150
- DOI
- 10.2147/orr.s348726
- Citations
- 26
Abstract (original English)
Partial thickness rotator cuff tears have been diagnosed with increased frequency due to heightened awareness and an improvement in diagnostic modalities. When >50% of the tendon thickness has ruptured, intra-tendinous strain of the residual tendon increases. Surgery is generally confined to patients who have failed non-operative measures and have persistent symptoms. The rationale for repairing partial thickness tears lies in their limited self-healing capacity, and propensity to enlarge over time and progress to a full thickness defect. Although tear debridement and acromioplasty can improve pain and function, tear progression can occur, in addition to worse results being noted in bursal-sided defects. Several surgical strategies have been recommended but there is a lack of evidence to advocate one form of treatment over another. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the treatment options for partial thickness tears of the rotator cuff.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
PLoS One1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Tendon healing in the era of regenerative medicine: literature review
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in Ann Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Ann Transl Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Treatment options for Achilles tendinopathy: a scoping review of preclinical studies
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, published in PeerJ (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
PeerJ4 citations