Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Optimal Medical Therapy Targeting Metabolic Status for Secondary Prevention in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Forzano I., Narciso V., Canonico ME., Castiello DS., Florimonte D., Manzi L.

Narrative Review on Systemic / IV, published in J Clin Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Clin Med (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41682789
PMCID
PMC12898431
DOI
10.3390/jcm15031108

Abstract (original English)

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Coronary artery disease is the most common clinical manifestation. The underlying pathology is largely attributable to atherosclerosis, a chronic inflammatory process that results in the development of atherosclerotic plaques. Coronary artery disease may present as chronic coronary syndrome or acute coronary syndrome, depending on the extent and stability of plaque disruption. The risk of cardiovascular events is modulated by established clinical and metabolic factors, and risk stratification frameworks are provided by international guidelines. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are classified as being at very high cardiovascular risk, despite improvements in invasive and non-invasive management. In this population, the residual ischemic risk remains a significant concern, underscoring the need for targeted secondary prevention strategies. The secondary prevention addresses modifiable risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, overweight and obesity, and tobacco use, along with recommendations for lifestyle modification. Nonetheless, current interventions leave a substantial proportion of patients exposed to future events, indicating a persistent unmet therapeutic need. Emerging evidence highlights the critical roles of lipid metabolism, inflammati

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research