Optimizing Oncolytic Virotherapy for Malignant Glioma: From Bench to Bedside
Jiang W., Tian Y., Gu H., Guan W.
Clinical Trial, published in Cancer Manag Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Cancer Manag Res (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40786912
- PMCID
- PMC12333633
- DOI
- 10.2147/cmar.s528875
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Malignant glioma is a highly aggressive brain tumor characterized by frequent recurrence, poor prognosis, and limited responsiveness to standard therapies. Glioblastoma multiforme, the most common and aggressive subtype, further complicates treatment due to its infiltrative nature, genetic heterogeneity, the protective blood-brain barrier, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Despite aggressive treatment strategies such as surgical resection combined with chemoradiotherapy, the median survival for malignant glioma patients remains low, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapeutic approaches. Oncolytic virotherapy (OVT), a dual-modality approach that combines immunotherapy and biotherapy, has emerged as a promising alternative. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can replicate continuously, disseminate within the tumor, and stimulate anti-tumor immunity, offering distinct advantages in targeting invasive and immunologically "cold" malignant glioma. However, the efficacy of OVT in clinical trials remains unsatisfactory, particularly in single-agent regimens. This limitation is primarily attributed to the viruses' limited replication efficiency, suboptimal immune induction, premature clearance by antiviral immune responses, and the blood-brain barrier, which impedes effective intracranial delivery. Thus, further optimization of viral modifications, delivery systems, and t
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.