Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Organic Bioelectronics in Microphysiological Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Biological Systems and Electronic Technologies

Coquart P., El Haddad A., Koutsouras DA., Bolander J.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Biosensors (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biosensors (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40277566
PMCID
PMC12025328
DOI
10.3390/bios15040253
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

The growing burden of degenerative, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and cancerous diseases necessitates innovative approaches to improve our pathophysiological understanding and ability to modulate biological processes. Organic bioelectronics has emerged as a powerful tool in this pursuit, offering a unique ability to interact with biology due to the mixed ionic-electronic conduction and tissue-mimetic mechanical properties of conducting polymers (CPs). These materials enable seamless integration with biological systems across different levels of complexity, from monolayers to complex 3D models, microfluidic chips, and even clinical applications. CPs can be processed into diverse formats, including thin films, hydrogels, 3D scaffolds, and electrospun fibers, allowing the fabrication of advanced bioelectronic devices such as multi-electrode arrays, transistors (EGOFETs, OECTs), ion pumps, and photoactuators. This review examines the integration of CP-based bioelectronics in vivo and in in vitro microphysiological systems, focusing on their ability to monitor key biological events, including electrical activity, metabolic changes, and biomarker concentrations, as well as their potential for electrical, mechanical, and chemical stimulation. We highlight the versatility and biocompatibility of CPs and their role in advancing personalized medicine and regenerative therapies and d

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansPolymersBiosensing TechniquesElectronicsMicrophysiological Systems

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research