Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Origin of cells that line damaged native blood vessels following endothelial cell transplantation.

Dailey SW., Rose DG., Carabasi RA., Ahlswede K., Williams SK.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Am J Surg (1991) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Am J Surg (1991)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
1650536
DOI
10.1016/0002-9610(91)90169-e

Abstract (original English)

Endothelial cell (EC) transplantation has been proposed as a method to reduce the thrombogenicity of both vascular grafts as well as injured native blood vessels. While techniques have been developed to establish EC monolayers on these surfaces, a major question that remains is whether the cells that exist on the blood flow surface are the same cells placed on the surface at the time of transplantation. We have developed an intravital fluorescent staining technique that permits isolated, autologous, fat-derived microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) to be labeled and subsequently detected following their transplantation. In our study, rat abdominal aortas (AA) were injured with a 3F embolectomy catheter, and the injured surfaces were immediately treated with fluorescently labeled MVEC. Five days after transplantation, AA were evaluated by both scanning electron and fluorescence microscopy. Results of scanning electron microscopy showed the existence of nonthrombogenic regions in the areas of injury, and fluorescence microscopy of the identical areas established that these cells contained fluorescent dye. Our results indicate that the cells that line these injured areas of native vessels are the same cells that were originally transplanted. Our intravital fluorescence technique provides a method to trace the origin and disposition of transplanted cells on the vascular surfaces.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsAorta, AbdominalCell TransplantationCells, CulturedEndothelium, VascularFemaleFluorescent DyesHistological TechniquesMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research