Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Orthobiologics for Cartilage Repair.

Mufti YN., Sachs JP., Bi AS., Sardesai KS., Yanke AB., Cole BJ.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Clin Sports Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Clin Sports Med (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41101911
DOI
10.1016/j.csm.2024.10.010

Abstract (original English)

Orthobiologics are substances derived from biological sources and are increasingly used in cartilage repair. Mesenchymal signaling cells (MSCs) play a crucial role in cartilage regeneration, but face challenges in clinical application. Platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, adipose tissue, and human umbilical cord blood have all demonstrated potential as sources for MSCs and growth factors necessary for cartilage repair. Existing cartilage repair techniques have shown good outcomes with additional orthobiologic augmentation. Emerging techniques involving third-generation and fourth-generation matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, decellularized or cryopreserved osteochondral grafts, and artificial scaffolds have demonstrated promising results long-term with cartilage repair procedures.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesPlatelet-Rich PlasmaTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdipose Tissue

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research