Orthobiologics in Trauma: Current Trends, Future Directions, and Regenerative Strategies
Al-Rumaih M., Al-Hoshan W., Al-Shehri M., Al-Harbi S., Al-Otaibi A.
Randomized Controlled Trial, published in Cureus (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Cureus (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42266289
- PMCID
- PMC13244128
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.108535
Abstract (original English)
There is a paradigm shift in the field of regenerative medicine in trauma toward the application of orthobiologics, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). This review critically examines the clinical evidence, mechanisms of action, and potential of orthobiologics in the treatment of delayed unions, non-unions, acute fractures, and soft-tissue injuries. The literature indicates that BMPs are effective in bone repair, particularly in open fractures. In non-unions, PRP and BMAC/MSCs have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in bone healing and decreased revision surgeries. Although the evidence is encouraging, the use of these treatments is limited by the differences in clinical trials, preparation procedures, and standardization. Over the next few years, the development of precision medicine will lead to clinical successes, with biomarker-based treatments and next-generation cell-free therapies, including exosomes, potentially complementing existing therapies. The review also highlights the need for rigorous randomized controlled trials, protocols and longitudinal research to integrate these promising therapies into trauma treatment algorithms.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.