Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Orthobiologics in Trauma: Current Trends, Future Directions, and Regenerative Strategies

Al-Rumaih M., Al-Hoshan W., Al-Shehri M., Al-Harbi S., Al-Otaibi A.

Randomized Controlled Trial, published in Cureus (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Cureus (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42266289
PMCID
PMC13244128
DOI
10.7759/cureus.108535

Abstract (original English)

There is a paradigm shift in the field of regenerative medicine in trauma toward the application of orthobiologics, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). This review critically examines the clinical evidence, mechanisms of action, and potential of orthobiologics in the treatment of delayed unions, non-unions, acute fractures, and soft-tissue injuries. The literature indicates that BMPs are effective in bone repair, particularly in open fractures. In non-unions, PRP and BMAC/MSCs have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in bone healing and decreased revision surgeries. Although the evidence is encouraging, the use of these treatments is limited by the differences in clinical trials, preparation procedures, and standardization. Over the next few years, the development of precision medicine will lead to clinical successes, with biomarker-based treatments and next-generation cell-free therapies, including exosomes, potentially complementing existing therapies. The review also highlights the need for rigorous randomized controlled trials, protocols and longitudinal research to integrate these promising therapies into trauma treatment algorithms.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.