Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Ossification of neurofibroma in neurofibromatosis type 1, a case report of a rare presentation.

Muroyama Y., Miura C., Imai Y., Suzuki T.

Case Report / Series on Scar, published in Int J Surg Case Rep (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Int J Surg Case Rep (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39128214
DOI
10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110151

Abstract (original English)

Although musculoskeletal involvement of Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) has been well documented, bone formation, or ossification, within neurofibroma, has been scarcely documented in literature. Here, we report a rare case of ossified neurofibroma in a patient with long history of NF1. 73-Year-old female with childhood-onset NF1 and surgical history of resection for multiple neurofibromas, presented with right ptosis and eyebrow ptosis. A growing tumor on the right eyebrow was surgically resected. Microscopically, the dermal tumor consists of bland spindle cells with thin, wavy nuclei, without atypia, showing S100 immunoreactivity, consistent with neurofibroma. Multiple metaplastic bone formation composed of mature bone trabeculae surrounding adipose tissue were apparent. Up to date, ossification of neurofibroma has been scarcely reported in literature. The etiology is unclear but might involve the response to chronic stress and tissue damage over the years, and/or might indicate the potential differentiation plasticity of mesenchymal stem cell-like population. The unusual presentation of ossification provides insights on the pathogenesis and differentiation plasticity of neurofibroma.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research