Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors and Potential Treatments

Charles S., Preston N.

Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Cureus (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Cureus (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39525184
PMCID
PMC11549666
DOI
10.7759/cureus.71188
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries result in abnormal knee motion and long-term joint degradation. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is done with the aim of restoring normal knee kinematics and slowing the joint degradation process. It does appear that this inevitably happens and can be impacted by a multitude of factors. The aim of this review was to examine the factors that influence the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) after ACLR and examine possible treatments that can aid in slowing that progression. A systematic review was conducted by searching all levels of evidence for all studies in English that assessed risk factors for developing OA after ACL reconstruction, had a minimum follow-up of 10 years, and used radiographical outcomes to measure the presence of OA. Studies on trial treatments to reduce osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction were also included. It was found that among the factors associated with an increased risk of post-ACLR OA are meniscal lesions, meniscectomy, increased age at the time of ACLR, increased time from injury to surgery, male sex, reduced range of motion, smaller thigh girth, graft complications, and failure. Additionally, in performing the ACLR, anteromedial femoral tunnel placement, higher graft tension, and following guidelines for performing anatomic ACLR have been shown to reduce the risk of OA as well. Patients should be adequately co

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research