Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Osteochondral tissue engineering‑based subchondral bone plate repair (Review)

Zhang X., Jiang W., Danzeng Q., Shen Y., Cui M.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Mol Med Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mol Med Rep (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40211705
PMCID
PMC11997743
DOI
10.3892/mmr.2025.13517

Abstract (original English)

Osteochondral defects are a series of pathological changes from the chondral surface to the deeper trabecular bone caused by trauma or degenerative changes; they typically induce serious joint dysfunction. Over the past few decades, various techniques have been attempted to repair these defects. Tissue‑engineered osteochondral grafts (TEOGs) with sophisticated architecture have been extensively explored for osteochondral regeneration. However, controversies persist regarding standards for clinical application of TEOGs. The present review focused on the design of TEOGs, emphasizing their capacity to repair the subchondral bone plate (SBP). The effect of animal models on techniques to repair osteochondral defects was also reviewed. To improve the evaluation of SBP regeneration, four typical histological characteristics (abnormal height, uneven surface, poor integration and loose internal structure) are summarized based on cases of unsatisfactory SBP regeneration. Incorporating mesenchymal stem cells with appropriate growth factors into trilayer or multilayer tissue‑engineered scaffolds is a promising strategy to avoid unsatisfactory SBP regeneration. Large animal models are recommended for translation to the clinic and there is a need to establish detailed and comprehensive osteochondral defect models in the future.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansDisease Models, AnimalTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research