The Outcome of Cell Therapy Treating Urinary Incontinence Correlates with Precise Cell Localization in the Sphincter Complex.
Harland N., Johnen L., Avula KT., Buzanich-Ladinig A., Schwarz L., Knoll J.
Laboratory Study, published in Biomedicines (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Biomedicines (2025)
- Country
- Switzerland
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 40299502
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines13040917
Abstract (original English)
Background/Objectives : Urethral sphincter muscle deficiency is the leading cause of stress urinary incontinence. Preclinical and clinical studies suggested that cell therapy may improve the situation. However, the overall efficacy of cell therapies did often not satisfy the patient's needs. We, therefore, investigated in a large animal model of incontinence if the localization of injected regenerative cells in the deficient urethral sphincter muscle correlated with the outcome. Methods : Urethral sphincter insufficiency was induced in three cohorts of pigs and confirmed by urodynamics. Then, either myogenic progenitor cells (MPCs) or adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) were injected into the injured sphincter complex by Williams needle under visual using a cystoscope. Sham-treated animals served as controls. Functional sphincter muscle regeneration was monitored by urodynamics over 5 weeks of follow-up. The localization of the injected cells was investigated by histology of cryosections of the tissue targeted. Results : Injection of MPCs near the sphincter muscle yielded better functional recovery when compared to MPC injections in adjacent sides. By contrast, injection of ADSCs in the submucosal tissue adjacent to the muscle led to better regeneration when compared to ADSC injections into the sphincter muscle. After five weeks of follow-up, MPCs yielded an overall ro
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.