Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Overcoming challenges in cartilage regeneration: The role of chondrogenic inducers

Nguyen MT., Gronthos S., Zhao Y., Chandrakanthan V., Truong VK., Vasilev K.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Bioeng Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioeng Transl Med (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42016862
PMCID
PMC13093458
DOI
10.1002/btm2.70079
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Cartilage regeneration presents unique challenges due to its avascular structure, sparse cell population, and limited regenerative capacity. Recent years have seen significant advancements in the field, which warrant an integrated review that connects chondrogenesis and its practical application. This review aims to deliver comprehensive and analytical guidelines for understanding the complex process of chondrogenesis, emphasizing its critical role in cartilage regeneration. It reviews key inducers such as growth factors, mechanical stimuli, hypoxia, and electric fields, as well as their synergistic integration with biomaterials to facilitate effective strategies for repairing and regenerating damaged cartilage tissue. In addition to exploring these advancements, the paper also provides a critical evaluation of current methods used to assess chondrogenesis in in vitro and in vivo models, identifying gaps and possibilities for improvement. A particular focus is placed on addressing the translational challenges that hinder the clinical implementation of cutting-edge research findings, offering actionable strategies to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and patient outcomes. By examining emerging trends and consolidating recent innovations, this review aims to offer a holistic perspective on cartilage repair. It serves as a guide for researchers and clinicians, advocati

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research