Overcoming challenges in cartilage regeneration: The role of chondrogenic inducers
Nguyen MT., Gronthos S., Zhao Y., Chandrakanthan V., Truong VK., Vasilev K.
Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Bioeng Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Bioeng Transl Med (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42016862
- PMCID
- PMC13093458
- DOI
- 10.1002/btm2.70079
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Cartilage regeneration presents unique challenges due to its avascular structure, sparse cell population, and limited regenerative capacity. Recent years have seen significant advancements in the field, which warrant an integrated review that connects chondrogenesis and its practical application. This review aims to deliver comprehensive and analytical guidelines for understanding the complex process of chondrogenesis, emphasizing its critical role in cartilage regeneration. It reviews key inducers such as growth factors, mechanical stimuli, hypoxia, and electric fields, as well as their synergistic integration with biomaterials to facilitate effective strategies for repairing and regenerating damaged cartilage tissue. In addition to exploring these advancements, the paper also provides a critical evaluation of current methods used to assess chondrogenesis in in vitro and in vivo models, identifying gaps and possibilities for improvement. A particular focus is placed on addressing the translational challenges that hinder the clinical implementation of cutting-edge research findings, offering actionable strategies to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and patient outcomes. By examining emerging trends and consolidating recent innovations, this review aims to offer a holistic perspective on cartilage repair. It serves as a guide for researchers and clinicians, advocati
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci