Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Overcoming ice: cutting-edge materials and advanced strategies for effective cryopreservation of biosample

Huang M., Hu M., Cai G., Wei H., Huang S., Zheng E.

Narrative Review, published in J Nanobiotechnology (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Nanobiotechnology (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40050919
PMCID
PMC11887326
DOI
10.1186/s12951-025-03265-6
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Cryopreservation techniques have been widely used, especially in biomedical applications and preservation of germplasm resources. Ideally, biological materials would maintain functional integrity as well as a normal structure and can be recovered when needed. However, this tool does not work all the time. Ice formation and growth are the key challenges. The other major reason is that the cryoprotective agents (CPAs) currently used do not meet these needs and are always accompanied by their cytotoxicity. A comprehensive and synergistic approach that focuses on the overall frozen biological system is crucial for the evolution of cryopreservation methods. In this review, we first summarize the fundamental damage mechanisms during cryopreservation, as well as common cryoprotectants and their limitations. Next, we discuss materials that interact with ice to improve cryopreservation outcomes. We evaluated natural and synthetic materials, including sugars and polymers, AFPs and mimics, ice nucleators, and hydrogels. In addition, biochemical regulation, which enhances the tolerance of biosamples to cryopreservation-induced stresses, was also mentioned. Nanotechnology, cell encapsulation, cryomesh, and isochoric freezing, such scalable approaches, are further discussed for cryopreservation. Finally, future research directions in this field for efficient cryopreservation are proposed. We

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansHydrogelsCryoprotective AgentsCryopreservationIceNanotechnology

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.