Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

An Overview of Recent Clinical Trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapies

Ganesan O., Orgill DP.

Clinical Trial on Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetic Foot, published in J Clin Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
J Clin Med (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39768578
PMCID
PMC11676782
DOI
10.3390/jcm13247655
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major complication of diabetes, leading to high mortality, reduced quality of life, neuropathy, ischemia, infection, and amputation risks. The prevalence of these ulcers is only on the rise as more people suffer from type 2 diabetes and obesity. The current wound management involves wound dressings, offloading, debridement, and infection control, but more must be done to keep up with the rising prevalence of DFUs and the strain they put on patients and the healthcare system. To find recent therapeutic advances in DFU treatment, we searched PubMed for novel therapeutics from the past 5 years. We found a diversity of promising interventions, including advanced wound dressings and topicals, physical energy-based therapies, regenerative scaffolds, and growth factor- and cell-based therapies. Recent therapies hold significant promise in healing more DFUs faster and more effectively. Providers should consider employing safe, novel therapeutics when standard dressings are not effective.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research