Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Oxygen-releasing scaffolds in tissue engineering: design strategies, fabrication and regenerative applications

Shang Y., Wang L., Shen H., Jia M., Gao H., Liu Y.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Regen Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Biomater (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42282945
PMCID
PMC13250950
DOI
10.1093/rb/rbag096

Abstract (original English)

Oxygen is indispensable for sustaining tissue and cell physiological functions, yet a hypoxic microenvironment often arises in tissue injury and regeneration, impairing graft scaffold performance and hindering repair processes. Thus, oxygen-releasing scaffolds have become a pivotal research frontier in tissue engineering. Via elaborate spatial constructions (e.g. electrospun fibers, hydrogels, microspheres) and diverse modification strategies, these scaffolds enable sustained, spatiotemporally controllable oxygen release at injury sites, alleviating local hypoxia and boosting tissue regeneration. They show great application potential in repairing skin, bone, nerve and cardiovascular tissues, as well as in tumor therapy, though comprehensive systematic summaries of their tissue engineering applications remain scarce. This review aims to delineate domain advances systematically: it first gives a holistic overview of core aspects, including oxygen carrier categories and delivery mechanisms, scaffold material modification and functionalization, intelligent responsiveness optimization and reactive oxygen species scavenging paradigms, then comprehensively recapitulates their application status and therapeutic efficacy across diverse scenarios (skin wound repair, bone defect regeneration, nerve injury remediation, tumor therapy, cardiovascular tissue reconstruction); finally, dissects

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research