Oxygen-releasing scaffolds in tissue engineering: design strategies, fabrication and regenerative applications
Shang Y., Wang L., Shen H., Jia M., Gao H., Liu Y.
Narrative Review on Scar, published in Regen Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Regen Biomater (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42282945
- PMCID
- PMC13250950
- DOI
- 10.1093/rb/rbag096
Abstract (original English)
Oxygen is indispensable for sustaining tissue and cell physiological functions, yet a hypoxic microenvironment often arises in tissue injury and regeneration, impairing graft scaffold performance and hindering repair processes. Thus, oxygen-releasing scaffolds have become a pivotal research frontier in tissue engineering. Via elaborate spatial constructions (e.g. electrospun fibers, hydrogels, microspheres) and diverse modification strategies, these scaffolds enable sustained, spatiotemporally controllable oxygen release at injury sites, alleviating local hypoxia and boosting tissue regeneration. They show great application potential in repairing skin, bone, nerve and cardiovascular tissues, as well as in tumor therapy, though comprehensive systematic summaries of their tissue engineering applications remain scarce. This review aims to delineate domain advances systematically: it first gives a holistic overview of core aspects, including oxygen carrier categories and delivery mechanisms, scaffold material modification and functionalization, intelligent responsiveness optimization and reactive oxygen species scavenging paradigms, then comprehensively recapitulates their application status and therapeutic efficacy across diverse scenarios (skin wound repair, bone defect regeneration, nerve injury remediation, tumor therapy, cardiovascular tissue reconstruction); finally, dissects
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations