Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Pain Reduction Using Ropivacaine in Tumescent Solution following Lipoaspiration

Mantripragada K., Yerke Hansen P., Vazquez OA., Pires G., Becker H.

Case Report / Series, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36776592
PMCID
PMC9911196
DOI
10.1097/gox.0000000000004747
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Tumescent solution utilizing dilute epinephrine and a local anesthetic agent injected into a fat compartment has been shown to effectively minimize blood loss and postoperative pain in liposuction. Ropivacaine has a longer duration of action compared to lidocaine and is a potential analgesic in tumescent solution. We sought to explore the effect of using ropivacaine in a tumescent technique with a focus on its efficacy for pain control postoperatively. The formula for the tumescent technique used combined 1 mL of epinephrine with 30 mL of ropivacaine into 500 mL of injectable saline. Tumescent solution was injected manually into fat donor sites of 10 consecutive patients followed by a 20-minute waiting period before beginning fat aspiration with liposuction cannula. Patients were seen immediately following their surgery and on postoperative day 1 and reported their pain using a numerical scale. Data gathered included the amount of ropivacaine used, average pain rating, and the average amount of fat removed. On average, participants reported little to no pain at the donor sites immediately following surgery and on postoperative day 1. Based on the low need for pain medication, we believe that ropivacaine may be successfully used in tumescent solution to reduce postoperative pain.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.