Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Passage-Dependent Size Distributions of Human-Derived Cells: Implications for Metabolic Assays

Botte E., Mancini P., Magliaro C., Ahluwalia A.

Laboratory Study, published in FASEB J (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
FASEB J (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42268592
PMCID
PMC13252009
DOI
10.1096/fj.202600816rr

Abstract (original English)

Biological noise is ubiquitous in living systems; yet, it is often neglected in cell-based experiments, potentially biasing data interpretation. We provide a quantitative characterization of single-cell equivalent diameter distributions in six human cell types using cell counting. By analyzing thousands of cells over passage number, we show that cell size is phenotype dependent and varies significantly with passage, with most cell types exhibiting a progressive reduction in median diameter. This variability is structured: When diameters are converted to masses, the distributions obey scaling laws, revealing conserved statistical properties of human cells in culture. Because key physiological processes such as metabolism scale with cell mass, passage-dependent shifts in diameter distributions can propagate into functional readouts. We show that changes in cell size are sufficient to bias estimates of construct-level metabolic rate, potentially confounding the interpretation of size-normalized assays and treatment effects. Our results highlight that biological noise in vitro is a source of statistical structure that enables scaling analyses and a dynamic property that, if ignored, can lead to systematic misinterpretation of experimental outcomes. Accounting for size distributions and their evolution over passages may therefore improve experimental design, data interpretation, and

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansCell Culture TechniquesCell CountCell Size

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.