Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

A passage-free, simplified, and scalable novel method for iPSC generation in three-dimensional culture

Tsukamoto M., Kawasaki T., Vemuri MC., Umezawa A., Akutsu H.

Laboratory Study, published in Regen Ther (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Ther (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38496009
PMCID
PMC10940796
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2024.02.005
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have immense potential for use in disease modeling, etiological studies, and drug discovery. However, the current workflow for iPSC generation and maintenance poses challenges particularly during the establishment phase when specialized skills are required. Although three-dimensional culture systems offer scalability for maintaining established iPSCs, the enzymatic dissociation step is complex and time-consuming. In this study, a novel approach was developed to address these challenges by enabling iPSC generation, maintenance, and differentiation without the need for two-dimensional culture or enzymatic dissociation. This streamlined method offers a more convenient workflow, reduces variability and labor for technicians, and opens up avenues for advancements in iPSC research and broader applications.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.