Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Pathophysiology-guided biomarkers and therapeutics for precision trauma medicine in polytrauma with musculoskeletal injuries

Thanapaul RJRS., Govindarajulu MY., Pundkar CY., Arun P.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Mil Med Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mil Med Res (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41953052
PMCID
PMC13054574
DOI
10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100014

Abstract (original English)

Polytrauma with predominant musculoskeletal (MSK) injury, resulting from blast, blunt, and crush mechanisms, remains a leading and complex challenge in both military and civilian medicine. These injuries not only disrupt tissues structurally but also trigger systemic cascades involving immune imbalance, endothelial dysfunction, mitochondrial stress, and premature cellular senescence. Such pathological processes contribute to both immediate clinical instability and long-term complications such as fibrosis, aberrant bone formation, neuroinflammation, and chronic disability. Conventional injury assessments, which rely heavily on anatomical scoring and nonspecific blood markers, fail to capture the dynamic molecular landscape underlying these conditions. To address this critical gap, we performed a comprehensive scoping review integrating evidence from basic science, translational studies, and clinical research published between January 2000 to June 2025, with particular emphasis on recent advances. The review highlights the discovery and validation of emerging blood-based and molecular biomarkers, including fatty acid-binding protein 3, syndecan-1, galectin-3, and trauma-associated microRNAs, as well as innovative diagnostic paradigms such as wearable biosensors, minimally invasive liquid biopsy platforms, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analytics. Unlike prior reviews, ou

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Musculoskeletal SystemHumansMultiple TraumaBiomarkersPrecision Medicine

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research