Personalized regenerative strategies and molecular diagnosis for in vitro fertilization success: a case report
Hernández-Melchor D., Madrazo I., Padilla-Viveros A., Camargo F., López-Bayghen E.
Case Report / Series, published in Oxf Med Case Reports (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- Oxf Med Case Reports (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 37091684
- PMCID
- PMC10120426
- DOI
- 10.1093/omcr/omad037
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Limited options are available for infertility associated with damaged or suboptimal tissues, typically the endometrium or ovaries. The goal of regenerative medicine is to restore function to specific tissues. Here, a 35-year-old female patient underwent two interventions of regenerative medicine: (i) autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were applied in the myometrium, and (ii) intraovarian infusion of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). After two failed in vitro fertilization cycles (IVF), in which the endometrium was <5 mm, MSCs were applied, achieving a 7 mm trilaminar lining; however, the embryo quality remained poor. Therefore, intraovarian PRP was utilized for the next IVF cycle; the patient's response improved, and a euploid embryo developed. After the embryo transfer and a normal 38 weeks of pregnancy, a baby girl was born. Here, we demonstrate two forms of regenerative medicine that can be utilized to improve IVF.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.