Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Phenotypic Features of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Subpopulations Obtained under the Influence of Various Toll-Like Receptors Ligands.

Shoshina OO., Kozhin PM., Shadrin VS., Romashin DD., Rusanov AL., Luzgina NG.

Laboratory Study, published in Bull Exp Biol Med (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Bull Exp Biol Med (2021)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33725247
DOI
10.1007/s10517-021-05105-7

Abstract (original English)

The paper characterizes phenotypic features of subpopulations of human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) resulting from exposure to Toll-like receptors ligands. MSC1 and MSC2 phenotypes were induced by exposure to LPS and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, respectively. Different exposures to Toll-like receptors ligands, short-term (3 h) and long-term (24 h), were studied. The cytokine profile of cells with the MSC2 phenotype differed depending on the duration of exposure to the inductor, while the cytokine profile of cells with the MSC1 phenotype remained stable. Morphometric features of mesenchymal stem cells with the MSC1 and MSC2 phenotypes, as well as differences in the IDO gene expression were identified. These differences can be used to distinguish between these cell types.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsToll-Like Receptor 3Toll-Like Receptors

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.