Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Physical stimulation and scaffold composition efficiently support osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Heydari Asl S., Hosseinpoor H., Parivar K., Hayati Roodbari N., Hanaee-Ahvaz H.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Tissue Cell (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Tissue Cell (2017)
Country
Scotland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29429509
DOI
10.1016/j.tice.2017.11.001
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Background Despite significant achievements in the field of tissue engineering, simplification and improvement of the existing protocols are of great importance. The use of complex differentiation media, due to the presence of multiple factors, may have some undesired effects on cell health and functions. Thus, minimizing the number of involved factors, while maintaining the differentiation efficiency, provides less costly and controllable conditions. Adipose-derived Mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs), the adult stem cells present in adipose tissue, can be a suitable source of stem cells due to abundant and ease of access. The aim of this study is to optimize the osteogenic differentiation of ASCs by chemical composition of scaffold, in the first step, and then by electromagnetic treatments. Methods ASCs were cultured on PVA/PES scaffold and tissue culture polystyrene surfaces (TCPS) and osteogenic differentiation was performed with either osteogenic medium, or electromagnetic field or both. The impact of each treatment on ASCs growth and proliferation was measured by MTT assay. Changes in gene expression levels of osteogenic-specific markers including ALP and RUNX2 were determined by Real Time PCR. Furthermore, alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition were measured. Results The MTT assay showed the significant effects on cell growth and respiration in scaffold-seeded AS

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationElectromagnetic FieldsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisPhysical StimulationTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research