Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: Advances, Mechanisms, and Translational Prospects

Wang H., Li Y.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Funct Biomater (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42042279
PMCID
PMC13117334
DOI
10.3390/jfb17040173

Abstract (original English)

Piezoelectric biomaterials have attracted considerable interest in osteochondral tissue engineering owing to their inherent ability to produce electrical signals in response to mechanical stimuli without external power, thereby closely mimicking the physiological electrical microenvironment required for tissue regeneration. This review comprehensively summarizes recent insights into biological piezoelectricity from the molecular to the macroscopic level, highlighting its interplay with streaming potentials and its regulatory roles in bone and cartilage regeneration. We critically analyze recent advances in major piezoelectric material systems, including ceramics, polymers, and composite scaffolds, with emphasis on their structural characteristics, bioactive performance, and suitability for tissue-specific repair. Among them, polymer-based composite and hybrid piezoelectric scaffolds appear particularly promising for the development of flexible, high-performance osteochondral repair platforms, as they offer a more favorable balance between mechanical compliance, electromechanical output, and biological adaptability. Despite encouraging preclinical findings, significant challenges remain, including biocompatibility, controlled degradation kinetics, and the precise modulation of electrical cues for specific biological contexts. To address these barriers, future research should foc

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research