Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Pilot Study: Use of Stem Cell Therapy and Diced Cartilage in Secondary Rhinoplasty Cases Clinical Outcomes: The Golden Turkish Delight.

Unlu RE., Ozmut O., Ergani HM., Yasar B., Yildirim F.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 30, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
30
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39444535
PMCID
PMC11498922
DOI
10.1097/GOX.0000000000006243
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Although many techniques in the secondary rhinoplasty field have been developed in recent years, there are debates regarding achieving results with a high satisfaction rate. We aimed to share the surgical use technique in secondary rhinoplasty patients by enriching the Turkish delight technique with mesenchymal stem cells, which we described as the golden Turkish delight (GTD) technique, and the long-term patient satisfaction results. Methods The study was planned as prospective research, and 30 secondary rhinoplasty patients who presented to our service for rhinoplasty were included. The GTD technique was applied to these patients. The patient's satisfaction with the surgical procedure was evaluated at least 9-12 months after the surgery, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was used as a measurement tool. Results Of the participants, the satisfaction levels of 30 patients were evaluated with a 1-year follow-up on average, and the rate of those who improved was found to be 80% using the GAIS score. The rate of those with high GAIS scores and those with high satisfaction levels was approximately 56%. Twenty percent of the patients were not satisfied with the result. Conclusions When we evaluate the postoperative 1-year results of our patients in terms of satisfaction and complications, we may state that the absorption that may occur in the Turkish deligh

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.