Platelet-rich plasma in peripheral nerve injury repair: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and therapeutic potential
Shang K., Liu Y., Qadeer A.
Randomized Controlled Trial on Scar, published in Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41063785
- PMCID
- PMC12500476
- DOI
- 10.3389/ebm.2025.10746
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) pose a significant clinical challenge, often leading to incomplete functional recovery despite current treatments. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains high levels of growth factors and bioactive molecules, has emerged as a promising regenerative therapy for nerve repair and restoring function. This review consolidates current evidence on PRP applications in treating peripheral nerve injuries, examining molecular mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic potential. PRP markedly enhances nerve regeneration, improves recovery of sensory and motor functions, and alleviates neuropathic pain across various nerve injuries. It promotes axonal growth, reduces scar formation, stimulates Schwann cell proliferation, and modulates inflammation through the release of neurotrophic factors, including PDGF, VEGF, TGF-β, and IGF-1. Combining PRP with surgical techniques and biomaterial scaffolds yields better therapeutic results. Key factors influencing efficacy include platelet concentration, leukocyte content, activation methods, and patient-specific variables. PRP is a safe and effective option for peripheral nerve injury repair. However, challenges persist in standardizing preparation protocols, optimizing treatment timing, and fully understanding molecular mechanisms. Future research should focus on personalized PRP formulations, combination ther
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations