Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Pneumatospinning and Electrospinning Scaffolds for Meniscus Regeneration Using Human Embryonic-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Grogan SP., Dorthé EW., Williams AB., Glembotski NE., D'Lima DD.

Laboratory Study on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Bioengineering (Basel) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41899845
PMCID
PMC13023445
DOI
10.3390/bioengineering13030314
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

We evaluated human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ES-MSCs) on collagen scaffolds for meniscus-like neotissue formation and ex vivo repair of human osteoarthritic (OA) meniscal defects. Collagen type I fibrous scaffolds were pneumatospun, and laminate scaffolds were fabricated from electrospun PLA/collagen; crosslinked; heparin conjugated; fibronectin coated; functionalized with TGFβ1, TGFβ3, or PDGFbb; seeded with ES-MSCs; and cultured for 4 weeks, followed by in vitro assessment or ex vivo implantation into 3.5 mm human meniscus defects for 5 weeks. Pneumatospinning generated highly porous scaffolds that supported uniform cell infiltration, while laminate scaffolds demonstrated interlocking fiber interfaces and enhanced mechanical properties. TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 immobilization enhanced scaffold bioactivity, defined as growth factor-mediated increases in meniscus-like matrix deposition, collagen fiber organization, and meniscogenic gene expression, by significantly increasing safranin O staining, collagen type II deposition, collagen fiber polarization, and ACAN expression. TGFβ3 additionally increased COL1A1 expression and pushout shear modulus; TGFβ1 increased peak pushout stress, indicating superior ex vivo mechanical integration. Laminate scaffolds resulted in extensive cell infiltration, robust neotissue formation (elastic modulus ~2.4 MPa), and improved e

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research