Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Polycomb protein family member CBX7 plays a critical role in cancer progression

Pallante P., Forzati F., Federico A., Arra C., Fusco A.

Narrative Review, published in Am J Cancer Res (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Am J Cancer Res (2015)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
26175930
PMCID
PMC4497428
Citations
51

Abstract (original English)

CBX7 is a polycomb protein that participates in the formation of polycomb repressive complex 1. Apart from few exceptions, CBX7 expression is lost in human malignant neoplasias and a clear correlation between its downregulated expression and a cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis has been observed. These findings indicate a critical role of CBX7 in cancer progression. Consistently, CBX7 is able to differentially regulate crucial genes involved in cancer progression and in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, as osteopontin and E-cadherin. Recent evidences indicate a role of CBX7 also in the modulation of response to therapy. In conclusion, CBX7 represents an important prognostic factor, whose loss of expression in general indicates a bad prognosis and a progression towards a fully malignant phenotype.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.