Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Polyglutamine toxicity in non-neuronal cells

Bradford JW., Li S., Li XJ.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Cell Res (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Res (2010)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
20231860
PMCID
PMC3074229
DOI
10.1038/cr.2010.32
Citations
27

Abstract (original English)

The neurodegenerative polyglutamine diseases are caused by an expansion of unstable polyglutamine repeats in various disease proteins. Although these mutant proteins are expressed ubiquitously in neuronal and non-neuronal cells, they cause selective degeneration of specific neuronal populations. Recently, increasing evidence shows that polyglutamine disease proteins also affect non-neuronal cells. However, it remains unclear how the expression of polyglutamine proteins in non-neuronal cells contributes to the course of the polyglutamine diseases. Here, we discuss recent findings about the expression of mutant polyglutamine proteins in non-neuronal cells and their influence on neurological symptoms. Understanding the contribution of non-neuronal polyglutamine proteins to disease progression will help elucidate disease mechanisms and also help in the development of new treatment options.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
NeurogliaHumansMuscular Disorders, AtrophicHuntington DiseaseSpinocerebellar AtaxiasMyoclonic Epilepsies, ProgressiveHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemPeptides

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research