Polymeric Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds in Craniofacial Bone Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review
Bashir MH., Korany NS., Farag DBE., Abbass MMS., Ezzat BA., Hegazy RH.
Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Biomolecules (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomolecules (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 36830575
- PMCID
- PMC9953024
- DOI
- 10.3390/biom13020205
- Citations
- 16
Abstract (original English)
Nanocomposite biomaterials combine a biopolymeric matrix structure with nanoscale fillers. These bioactive and easily resorbable nanocomposites have been broadly divided into three groups, namely natural, synthetic or composite, based on the polymeric origin. Preparing such nanocomposite structures in the form of hydrogels can create a three-dimensional natural hydrophilic atmosphere pivotal for cell survival and new tissue formation. Thus, hydrogel-based cell distribution and drug administration have evolved as possible options for bone tissue engineering and regeneration. In this context, nanogels or nanohydrogels, created by cross-linking three-dimensional polymer networks, either physically or chemically, with high biocompatibility and mechanical properties were introduced as promising drug delivery systems. The present review highlights the potential of hydrogels and nanopolymers in the field of craniofacial tissue engineering and bone regeneration.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Oncologic safety of autologous fat grafting in head and neck cancer patients: A scoping review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 116 on Face & Skin, published in Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 116
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell-derived exosomes in tissue regeneration of oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, published in Medicine (Baltimore) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Medicine (Baltimore) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stromal Vascular Fraction-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Aesthetic Plast Surg - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The use of cellular therapies for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review of behavioral and molecular outcomes.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 8 on Neuroinflammation, published in Neurosurg Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 8
Neurosurg Rev - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, published in J Funct Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Funct Biomater