Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Possible Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration in Maxillofacial Surgery

Marini L., Tel A., Zeppieri M., Michelutti L., Robiony M., Gagliano C.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Diagnostics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41374359
PMCID
PMC12691056
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics15232978

Abstract (original English)

Background : The integration of 3D bioprinting, biomaterials science, and cellular biology presents a viable strategy for maxillofacial bone regeneration, overcoming the constraints of traditional graft techniques. This review offers a thorough examination of the present condition, obstacles, uses, and future outlook of 3D bioprinting technology in maxillofacial bone regeneration. An essential understanding has been attained by analyzing the technological constraints, specifically in vascularization and neuro-integration, and by delineating the vital translational pathway from benchtop models to clinical application. We have examined several bioprinting techniques-namely extrusion, inkjet, and laser-assisted methods-and the requisite bioinks, emphasizing their physicochemical and biological features vital for osteogenesis. Significant clinical applications, including the treatment of trauma-induced abnormalities and the reconstruction of oncology-related resections, have been emphasized. This review highlights the urgent necessity for established regulatory frameworks and refined printing settings to guarantee effective, functional, and durable bone substitutes, providing a distinct pathway for future research and clinical implementation in this specialized surgical domain. Aim : The purpose of this review was to present a general overview of the current clinical and diagnostic

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research