Potential of dental pulp stem cells and their products in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration and their future applications
Xing WB., Wu ST., Wang XX., Li FY., Wang RX., He JH.
Narrative Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in World J Stem Cells (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- World J Stem Cells (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 37970238
- PMCID
- PMC10631371
- DOI
- 10.4252/wjsc.v15.i10.960
- Citations
- 5
Abstract (original English)
Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) seriously affects people's quality of life. Stem cell therapy is considered a promising new option for the clinical treatment of PNI. Dental stem cells, particularly dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), are adult pluripotent stem cells derived from the neuroectoderm. DPSCs have significant potential in the field of neural tissue engineering due to their numerous advantages, such as easy isolation, multidifferentiation potential, low immunogenicity, and low transplant rejection rate. DPSCs are extensively used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, including for the treatment of sciatic nerve injury, facial nerve injury, spinal cord injury, and other neurodegenerative diseases. This article reviews research related to DPSCs and their advantages in treating PNI, aiming to summarize the therapeutic potential of DPSCs for PNI and the underlying mechanisms and providing valuable guidance and a foundation for future research.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as biomarker in stem cell-based therapies of preclinical spinal cord injury models: A systematic review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Tissue Cell (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Tissue Cell3 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Revolutionizing neural regeneration with smart responsive materials: Current insights and future prospects
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Bioact Mater5 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 42 on Diabetic Foot, Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 42
Adv Sci (Weinh)18 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurosci